The "New" Prostate Cancer InfoLink Social Network

A Service of Prostate Cancer International

John
  • Lakewood, CA
  • United States
Share 

John's Friends

John's Groups

 

John's Page

Gifts Received

Gift

John has not received any gifts yet

Give John a Gift

Latest Activity

August 20
John joined Rick D.'s group
support for men who want and need to exercise after diagnosis - either to maintain or modify their existing regime or start a new one.
August 20
John left a comment for Rick D.
August 20
Individual risk, early detection, coexisting illness, suspicious biopsy, just diagnosed. What is my risk? How should I be treated?
August 20
Statistics and stories about scalpels, sutures, and surgeons -- everything you want to know about prostate cancer surgery.
August 20
John updated their profile
August 20
August 20
August 20
August 20
August 20
August 19
August 19
August 18
John was featured
August 18
John joined PaulC's group
Men under 50 or 55 often have concerns that are different from those over 65 or 70. Here's a place to talk about them. There's no age limit; indeed, it's helpful to get the older crowd's perspective on issues whose importance changes with age.
August 18
John is now a member of The "New" Prostate Cancer InfoLink Social Network
August 18

Profile Information

Have you been diagnosed with prostate cancer?
Yes
What brings you to the New Prostate Cancer InfoLink social network?
Quest for knowledge.
Would you help us grow the network? Would you tell others about it?
Yes
About Me:
My PSA has been chronically high for so long that I'd almost grown accustomed to it. In 2006 my urologist ordered a biopsy when my PSA didn't drop after a course of antibiotics. This biopsy came back clean. On July 21, another biopsy was performed. This biopsy showed a 3+3 malignancy in 2 of 12 cores. Prostate volume is 77 cc.

John's Blog

John

8/19/2009 Urological Oncologist Consultation

This afternoon my wife and I had my first meeting with a cancer specialist since my dx. My first impression was: "I'm getting old". Dr Desai started practicing about 6 years ago; my surgeon is a kid! His credentials seem top notch (Hopkins, Loma Linda, Mayo Clinic), active practice with 100+ minimally invasive prostate procedures a year. I'm just not used to thinking of my key advisers as "kids". Time to change my mindset.

The pathology on my CT and Bone Scans were unremarkable. What an odd ter… Continue

Posted on August 20, 2009 at 6:58am —

Comment Wall (5 comments)

You need to be a member of The "New" Prostate Cancer InfoLink Social Network to add comments!

Join this Ning Network

At 9:25pm on August 20, 2009, E. Michael D. ("Mike") Scott said…
John: The series of patients treated by Walsh at Johns Hopkins goes out to 25 years now. The long-term results of that series are excellent. However, it does need to be remembered that Walsh's primary initial objective was to demonstrate the fact that nerve-sparing surgery was achievable, and that men would regain erectile function post surgery, so there have always been stong implications that the selection criteria for the men in this series favored younger men those with a high probability of a good outcome ... but then you probably fall into that category anyway!
At 12:41am on August 20, 2009, George A. Brown said…
You know John, I jjsut read your CA address so lunch may have to be long distance. Welcome to the site
At 12:40am on August 20, 2009, George A. Brown said…
Hi John,
I live in Centennial, CO, so... when are we going to have lunch and talk about this PCa stuff. Your new friend George. call me at 303-680-0308
At 5:02pm on August 19, 2009, E. Michael D. ("Mike") Scott said…
So John ... At 47 years young you OUGHT to respond well to any good form of treatment. Based on the data you provided (and using the PSA value of 7.9), the Kattan pretreatment nomogram suggests that:

-- You have an 83% probability of organ confined disease
-- You have a 96% probability of biochemical recurrence-free survival at 10 years if you have surgery
-- You have an 84% probability of biochemical recurrence-free survival at 5 years if you have brachytherapy

Surgical response rates are ALL about the skill of the individual surgeon. And for someone with your numbers almost any surgeon is going to recommend surgery. The critical issue will be the ability of the surgeon to leave you fully continent and thoroughly potent within a few months after the surgery -- whether the surgeon uses a robot or not. You want someone who is doing 200+ procedures a year and can talk to you about his or her outcomes data specifically -- not someone who quotes other people's results.

When you say, "My first appointment with the oncologist is tomorrow afternoon," do you mean a medical oncologist or a radiation oncologist? I am assuming the latter.

Regarding how you "vet" a surgeon or an oncologist, have a look at the articles on this topic in the Tips & Tools section of the main web site (e.g., "How to pick a surgeon").

There's no specific protocol for getting a second opinion (assuming your insurance provider is covering this). Just ask for one. Have a look around on this site. Another patient who contacted us yesterday is going to be treated by a surgeon at City of Hope, for example. Look in the member list for Greg.

The implication of the high PIN in otherwise benign regions is that, in the long term, if you don't get treated, you are going to have multifocal cancer -- and you don't want that to happen, so you really do need treatment.

Finally, you can't "standardize" the statistics. However, there are relatively recent data that show that younger men like you who are diagnosed with Gleason 6 disease are at significantly higher risk for progressive disease over time if they don't get treatment that someone of (say) 65 with otherwise similar numbers. I would not think that active surveillance was a good idea for someone like you.

I hope this is helping. It is VERY difficult (even for the doctors) to make absolute recommendations for anyone because of all the things we still DON'T know about how best to treat this disorder.

Keep asking questions and we'll do our best to help.

Mike
At 2:54pm on August 18, 2009, E. Michael D. ("Mike") Scott said…
Welcome John. I'm sorry you were faced with the need to come find and join us, but hopefully we can giove you a little help and support.

A couple of questions:

-- Exactly how old are you?
-- What level had your PSA reached prior to the recent course of antibiotics?

It is very possible that you have both prostatitis and prostate cancer, but a Gleason score of 6 and a biopsy finding of prostate cancer in only 2/12 cores after two biopsies suggests that you should be eminently treatable. The important thing will be to make sure that that treatment is carried out by the most technically skilled person you can get there. You wouldn't get your high-performance sports car serviced by any corner garage. You's take it to a real specifialist. Give your prostate the same level of respect. There is no shortage of really experienced prostate cancer specialists in southern CA.

Please feel able to leave me a merssage if you have any specific questions that I may be able to help with.

Mike
 
 

Need InfoLink cards?

GENERAL DISCLAIMER

The "New" Prostate Cancer InfoLink's Social Network is intended for informational and educational purposes only. It is not engaged in rendering medical advice or professional services.

Any person who appears to knowingly render medical advice or promote a professional or commercial service on this site may be removed by the administrators without notice.

Information provided on this site should not be used for diagnosing or treating any health problem or disease.

The "New" Prostate Cancer InfoLink is not a substitute for professional care. If you have or suspect you may have a health problem, please consult your health care provider.
 

© 2009   Created by Arnon Krongrad, MD on Ning.   Create a Ning Network!

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy  |  Terms of Service