The "New" Prostate Cancer InfoLink Social Network

A Service of Prostate Cancer International

Martin Blackwell
  • Male
  • Glendale, California
  • United States
Share 

Martin Blackwell's Friends

Martin Blackwell's Groups

Martin Blackwell's Discussions

Infolink

Replied Jul. 17, 2008

Infolink

Replied Jul. 17, 2008

 

Martin's Page

Gifts Received

Gift

Martin Blackwell has not received any gifts yet

Give Martin Blackwell a Gift

Profile Information

Have you been diagnosed with prostate cancer?
no
What brings you to the New Prostate Cancer InfoLink social network?
Need to have a biopsy done
Would you help us grow the network? Would you tell others about it?
Sure
About Me:
I am 55 years old. My doctor has recommended a biopsy. I have no family history of cancer that i am aware of. So far i have had several PSAs over the past few months which started at about 3 and are now over 6. My latest DRE showed an "abnormality"

I don't know much about PC. I have suffered from depression for years and am worried about how what's coming will be affected by that.

Martin Blackwell's Blog

Martin Blackwell

Biopsy Results

BENIGN, BENIGN, BENIGN, BENIGN, BENIGN, BENIGN.

Dr. says BPH is my problem, since the biopsy report came back negative for cancer. I have a follow-up appointment in three months. I've been on Flomax for months with no effect, so i got a prescription for a different medication. I had a list of questions to ask my doctor if the results came back positive for cancer, but no questions at all if it came back negative.

Thanks to everyone here who has extended their hand in friendship, educated me, a… Continue

Posted on August 13, 2008 at 7:02pm — 6 Comments

Martin Blackwell

My Biopsy

Most of what i had read about the biopsy procedure indicated that it would not hurt. Only a couple things i read said otherwise. I don't know what accounts for the difference

I was prescribed a Valium to take this morning, and a Vicadin to take before the biopsy. The biopsy was done with local anesthesia (Lanacaine).

So i had my biopsy a few hours ago. It was not painful at all. The first sample the doctor took made me jump a little, but that was mostly out of surprise. After that it was smoot… Continue

Posted on August 1, 2008 at 7:30pm —

Martin Blackwell

My first steps

I am just beginning to learn about prostate cancer. It has entered my life unexpectedly. I have seen my doctor regularly and my health has always been good. I am 55 years old and the only thing i had to concern myself with was my cholesterol. My doctor was having me get regular blood tests to monitor it because the bad cholesterol was borderline. Following one of these tests earlier this year my doctor noticed something that she didn't like and recommended i get a PSA. When the PSA came back alm… Continue

Posted on July 15, 2008 at 8:30pm — 5 Comments

Comment Wall (37 comments)

You need to be a member of The "New" Prostate Cancer InfoLink Social Network to add comments!

Join this Ning Network

At 9:08am on February 1, 2009, E. Michael D. ("Mike") Scott said…
Re the frequency of urination ... Has anyone suggested that you might want to consider a TURP (transurethral resection of the prostate), the traditional treatment for BPH before drugs became available in the later 1990s.
At 5:00pm on January 31, 2009, E. Michael D. ("Mike") Scott said…
Martin:

Just thought I would check in and see how you were doing. Did the new medication help with the BPH?

Mike
At 11:52am on October 21, 2008, Manny Marroquin said…
Hi Martin,

I hope you are doing well and have made a decision on your health issue. I responded to your request for information back in July and I am wondering how you are doing. I am fine and just finished an assignment I had in DC. I am back home in Florida doing a little work from home. I am retired but I wanted to stay involved in the job market. I am 5 years post LRP surgery and doing well. As I stated I still work and travel quite a bit. I am off on a two week international trip the end of the month, my third such trip this year. My wife and I are truly enjoying life and we pray so are you. Take care and stay in touch. Manny
At 6:52pm on August 13, 2008, Martin Blackwell said…

At 4:55pm on August 12, 2008, E. Michael D. ("Mike") Scott said…
Good luck tomorrow Martin. Lotsa peoplke will have their fingers crossed for you. Be calm! Your in charge now! :O)
At 7:32am on August 3, 2008, E. Michael D. ("Mike") Scott said…
EX-cellent! That's GREAT Martin! Thank you.
At 9:17am on August 2, 2008, E. Michael D. ("Mike") Scott said…
Hi Martin: Glad to hear that the biopsy went well from a practical point of view. Let's hope the results are equally benign. And congratulations on the way you are handling all of this (at least in public!). You are sounding so much less anxious and so much more "in charge" of the situation, which is great!
At 11:20am on July 28, 2008, PaulC said…
Hi Martin,
Have you thought ahead to after August 1st? For example:
  • The biopsy comes back negative. Yay! So, what might be the reason for the PSA value going up? (BPH? infection?) What will you do to keep following whatever it is that's going on?
  • The biopsy comes back negative for cancer (yay!), but positive for PIN, or precancerous changes. What then? How often to keep checking, and what to do if things become positive?
  • The biopsy comes back positive for cancer (boo!), but it's only 3+3 in <10% of the cores (yay!) Do you incline towards Active Surveillance? If not, what kind of treatment seems like it might be a good fit for you? Would you want to bank sperm before starting treatment?
  • etc. ...
At 8:38am on July 15, 2008, Ira Gleiberman, M.D. said…
In my practice, by the time a Dr. thinks it's important enough to get a Bx, I see a (+) Bx about 30% of the time.
At 10:10pm on July 11, 2008, E. Michael D. ("Mike") Scott said…
FACS = Fellow of the American College of Surgeons, which is a fairly standard qualification held by many surgeons. A urologic oncologist id somene who treats exclusively urologic cancers (prostate, kidney, bladder, testicular, penile) and not other forms of urologic condition. See the article on the main site on "Finding a prostate cancer specialist who is right for YOU."
At 7:23pm on July 11, 2008, E. Michael D. ("Mike") Scott said…
Just a thought. You could ask Paul C who he has been seeing.
At 7:22pm on July 11, 2008, E. Michael D. ("Mike") Scott said…
Martin: I am not your doctor. I cannot tell you what to do. The problem I see here is that you have lost confidence in your current urologist and you need someone to feel confident in. I also do not understand your primary care doctor's comment that "time is of the essence." I believe you have a reasonable amount of time to decide what to do, although I do think you need a biopsy reasonably soon. Is the urologist you have been seeing a urologic oncologist or just a regular urologist? Do you even know?
At 3:44pm on July 11, 2008, E. Michael D. ("Mike") Scott said…
Hmmm ... Perchance it's time for you to go get a second opinion from someone who will talk to you!
At 3:27pm on July 11, 2008, E. Michael D. ("Mike") Scott said…
Hey Martin ... Did you get any feedback from the urologist's office on the DRE questions?
At 3:11pm on July 11, 2008, Steven Hess said…
Thanks for your response. If you follow the posts you will see that even if one is diagnosed with PCa most do very well. Once most of us get over the unavoidable shock of the "C" word and quickly become "experts" and pursue our chosen course of treatment it is a "process" and we manage to get through it. For most, incontinence and ED are the topics de jour and in that your "youth" is a big advantage (I am 70). Hopefully, of course, you will get a clean bill of health as regards PCa but in any case
there has been so much progress in the last decade that in many ways PCa has typically become more of a chronic disease for which there are good treatments.

If I may make one other observation, if it comes to it, chose the treatment with the best track record for good outcomes if it is available (every case is different). I read at times of someone who puts his erection ahead of his life (I can understand :) ) or gives more weight to the annoying but usually temporary incontinence than one should. Those things (in my opinion) are secondary to whatver the "gold standard" is for a particular case.
I am 3-1/2 months post-op. My cointinence is improving swifty. ED is a frustration but I am working on it. I feel fine, had outstanding results with an unfortunately high Gleason and kept my priorities in the right order.

The very best to you
Steve
At 1:52pm on July 11, 2008, Steven Hess said…
...I said "my wife saved my life"...I should, of course, have said "my wife and my skilled and outstanding surgeon saved my life" My gratitude to both cannot be adequately expressed.

Steve
At 1:47pm on July 11, 2008, Steven Hess said…
Hi Martin
I just stumbled on your postings. Permit me to comment from the perspective of an individual who first had a rising PSA 10 years ago, had two negative biopsies, annual increases in PSA and a "spike last November. I am married to a physician who countered my fears, "cowardice" and wishful thinking by insisting on the earliest possible re-biospy which announced a high grade PCa. My wife practically shoved me into the OR and an RLRP because of my initial Gleason 8, upgraded to a Gleason 9 post-op. She saved my life. I am sure of it. One of my earlier negative biopsies was a horror show (this was before I had met my current wife) and I did not wish to repeat the experience. My wife assured me that there is no reason to go through a painful ---urologists like to use the word "discomfort" but let's call pain, pain!---biopsy, unless one might have cardio vascular issues or other comorbidity that increase the risk of general anesthesia. Anyway, she made sure I had the biopsy under a "general" and I didn't remember or feel a thing after they wheeled me into the biopsy room.

But Wait There's More!

Because I was "out" and the urologist could really have a go at me without me flopping around like Mel Gibson in "Braveheart"
he was able to do an especially thorough biopsy and harvest a shopping cart full of cores. Guess what, because of that they found a "tiny" (Good!) tumor of high grade (BAD) Gleason 9 cancer. This tiny tumor could easily have been missed if the urologist had taken lesser cores because of "discomfort" concerns.

Lesson: You the patient must be the advocate for your health and treatment. Fear is natural (tell me about it!) but delaying appropriate tests and treatment is playing Russian roulette.

I had a very nasty tumor but I think of it as catching a rattlesnake still in its shell and it's gone. Had I delayed half a year or a year I feel positive I would not have had the outstanding post-op results I had.

Fear and denial and procrastination would have gotten me had I not been so fortunate as to have a partner who would have none of it.

Steve
At 8:17am on July 9, 2008, E. Michael D. ("Mike") Scott said…
Rats! Sorry to hear that.
At 10:20pm on July 8, 2008, E. Michael D. ("Mike") Scott said…
So Martin:

1. You absolutely were not "really stupid." You just didn't know. It would have been kind if the doctor could have managed to find at least 5 minutes to say to you, "Do you understand what I am telling you? Do you have any immediate questions?"

2. "Abnormality" in the chart could simply be a reference to the PSA test result. Call the doctor's office tomorrow and ask for the doctor to call you back because you have two questions:

The first question should be, "When you did the DRE on me, did I have any physical abnormality; was the DRE positive or negative?"

The second question (which you only need to ask if he tells you the DRE was positive) should be, "How positive? One lobe? Both lobes? What?"

The presence of a positive DRE "upstages" your cancer (if you have cancer) from clinical T1c disease to clinical T2 disease. To get an explanation of those terms, see the section on clinical staging on the main site.
At 9:56pm on July 8, 2008, E. Michael D. ("Mike") Scott said…
Martin: I saw your question for Dr. K. on the main site. Did you have a positive digital rectal exam (DRE)? You don't mention that in your profile. If you didn't, then there is a very significant reduction in your potential risk for a positive biopsy (from 65% to 43%) and your potential risk for it being a high grade cancer goes down from 22% to 10%.

Conversely, if you DID have a positive DRE, what did your doctor tell you he thought he could feel?
 
 

Need InfoLink cards?

GENERAL DISCLAIMER

The "New" Prostate Cancer InfoLink's Social Network is intended for informational and educational purposes only. It is not engaged in rendering medical advice or professional services.

Any person who appears to knowingly render medical advice or promote a professional or commercial service on this site may be removed by the administrators without notice.

Information provided on this site should not be used for diagnosing or treating any health problem or disease.

The "New" Prostate Cancer InfoLink is not a substitute for professional care. If you have or suspect you may have a health problem, please consult your health care provider.
 

© 2009   Created by Arnon Krongrad, MD on Ning.   Create a Ning Network!

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy  |  Terms of Service